SONY in April this year released the positioning flagship micro single camera a9, a short period of time caused a heated debate in the market, but rational consumers face the price of 3W+, many users can not help but ask: regardless of faith, SONY a9 really worth it? In many question-and-answer communities, there will often be such a question, which leads to the fierce debate of the cable black or cable fans, but I believe that more than 90% of keyboard players have not touched the real machine, nor will they buy it, why is this?
A9 has a lot of competitive parameters for new upgrades, but most people don't really care about and buy it. The price is 28,999 yuan. Corresponding to this price range are the Canon 1DX Mark II and the nikon D5. The Canon 1DX Mark II is priced at 34,499 yuan and the nikon D5 at 39,888 yuan. The camera of nearly 30,000 yuan, we to its requirement is necessarily harsh, cannot "make do with".
Advantage of SONY A9: the king of parameters is not built
Judging by the camera's specs, the SONY a9 may have delivered a high score, with many of the sports photographer's primary concerns: high focus, high resolution, and dense focus. The sensor is only 24.2 megapixels, but it's the highest of any flagship camera (20.2 million for the Canon 1DX Mark II and 20.82 million for the nikon D5). The continuous shooting speed is the fastest of the three. Although the 20fps is achieved in electronic shutter mode, which is somewhat different from the SLR, the Canon 1DX Mark II, the fastest continuous shooting in the SLR, only reaches 16fps. To more than $693 to focus focus number A9 coverage of 93%, but from the point of focus number, actually a lot more than optical focusing spot and but Canon 1 dx2 in live view mode, all pixels dual-core every pixel CMOS AF theory can become a focus of, so can't focus on number AF performance to measure.
